Agility

Edgren Side Step Test

Lateral Agility & Side-Stepping Speed

Course
5 lines · 3 ft apart (12 ft span)
Duration
10 seconds · best of 2–3 trials
Scoring
Lines crossed − faults · higher is better
Norms
Active adults 18–39 · youth & masters differ
Deduct 1 point each time the far line is not reached, the legs cross, or the trunk/feet turn from forward.
Disclaimer

This tool estimates your lateral agility by scoring the Edgren Side Step Test and comparing your result against published reference norms — it is for general information only, not medical or training advice. The test involves repeated explosive side-shuffles with quick changes of direction that load the ankles, knees, hips, and groin. Only attempt it once you are fully warmed up and have a base of movement conditioning, and stop immediately if you feel any pain. Consult a healthcare provider before maximal agility testing, especially if you have any knee, hip, ankle, groin, or back condition, or have not been training.

How This Calculator Works

This calculator measures your lateral agility — your speed, rhythm, and coordination when shuffling side to side — using the Edgren Side Step Test, one of the oldest field tests of side-stepping ability. You enter the number of lines you crossed in 10 seconds, and the calculator classifies your result against published Edgren reference norms, then reports your rating and an estimated percentile for your sex.

One thing to keep in mind throughout: for the Edgren test, a higher score is better. Every part of the calculator — the rating bands, the table, the distribution curve, the percentile — is built around more lines crossed being better, which is the opposite of a timed agility test where a lower time wins.

Step 1: Enter Your Details

The calculator needs two inputs, plus an optional third:

  • SexEdgren norms are reported separately for men and women because of differences in stature, stride, and lower-body power that affect side-stepping rate. — selects which normative table you are compared against.
  • Lines Crossed — the number of lines your feet crossed during the 10-second trial. This is your raw score.
  • Deductions (optional) — a penalty count for technique faults (explained below). Your final score is lines crossed minus deductions. Leave it at 0 if the trial was clean.

Notice there is no age input. Unlike timed sprint or change-of-direction tests, the published Edgren norms come from a single adult cohort and were never broken out by age — so adding an age field would imply a precision the source data does not have. (See Why there is no age model below.)

The Test Protocol

For results that match the norms, the test must be performed the way the norms were collected. The standard Edgren setup uses five parallel lines (or cones) on a flat, non-slip floor:

  • Setup: Five lines are marked in a row, 3 feet apart, spanning 12 feet between the two outer lines.
  • Start: Straddle the center line, facing forward (square to the lines, not turned toward either side).
  • Shuffle right: On the signal, side-step to the right until your lead foot crosses or touches the outer right line.
  • Shuffle left: Reverse and side-step all the way left until your lead foot crosses or touches the outer left line.
  • Continue: Shuffle back and forth between the outer lines for the full 10 seconds, staying square to the front throughout.
  • Score: Count the total number of lines crossed in the 10 seconds. The common practice is to run two or three trials and record the best.

Technique faults and deductions. The shuffle must be a true side-step, not a running cross-over. Deduct one point each time you: fail to reach the outer line before turning back, cross one leg over the other instead of shuffling, or rotate your trunk or feet to face the direction of travel. Enter the total number of such faults in the Deductions field. Equipment is minimal — tape or cones and a stopwatch — but the surface and footwear should be kept consistent between tests.

How Your Rating Is Determined

The published Edgren rating scale uses six named bands for each sex, from Needs Improvement up to Excellent. Rather than compress those into the platform's usual five-tier scale, this calculator keeps all six published bands exactly as reported, because each band boundary is a directly traceable published number:

Men (lines in 10 s): Excellent 24+  ·  Good 20–23  ·  Above Average 18–19  ·  Average 14–17  ·  Below Average 10–13  ·  Needs Improvement < 10
Women (lines in 10 s): Excellent 21+  ·  Good 17–20  ·  Above Average 15–16  ·  Average 12–14  ·  Below Average 8–11  ·  Needs Improvement < 8

Your final score is compared against these bands and you are placed in the highest band you qualify for. The six bands use the platform's tier colors, with one added amber for the sixth (since the locked palette defines five):

  • Needs Improvement — well below the typical range for your group. Below the 10th percentile. A clear starting point with substantial room to build side-stepping rate and coordination.
  • Below Average — under the population midpoint. Roughly the 10th–29th percentile.
  • Average — around the population midpoint. Roughly the 30th–49th percentile. Typical of recreationally active adults.
  • Above Average — just above the midpoint. Roughly the 50th–69th percentile.
  • Good — well above average. Roughly the 70th–89th percentile. Characteristic of well-conditioned, trained individuals.
  • Excellent — top band for your sex. 90th percentile and above. Among the quickest side-steppers in the demographic.

Why There Is No Age Model

Several tests on this platform smooth their standards across age, anchoring on a published young-adult value and modeling the gradual decline that follows. The Edgren test does not get that treatment, on purpose.

The widely published Edgren norms were collected on a single cohort of physically active adults, roughly 18–39, and were never stratified by individual age. There is no published young-adult-to-masters curve to anchor to. Inventing one would mean fabricating numbers the source data cannot support — so instead the calculator presents the norms honestly as a single adult-cohort reference and flags that youth and masters athletes fall outside the validated range. This is the same faithful, single-table approach used for the Hexagon Test rather than a modeled age curve.

How to Read the Norms Table

The norms table lists one row for each of the six rating bands, running Excellent at the top down to Needs Improvement, with the band names color-coded to match the distribution curve.

  • It shows only your selected sex. Choosing male or female displays a single column of line-count ranges for that sex, alongside the percentile range each band represents.
  • Each cell is the line-count range for that band.For example, a male "Good" of 20–23 means crossing 20 to 23 lines places you in the Good band. Cross enough lines to land inside a range and you earn that rating.
  • Your band is highlighted. The row matching your result is shaded in that band's color so you can see at a glance where you sit and what the next band up requires.

The Distribution Curve

The Where You Fall chart is a modeled distributionA normal (bell) curve fitted to the published percentile bands. Real side-step scores are not perfectly normal, so the curve is an illustrative approximation, not a measured population. of Edgren scores for active adults of your sex, shaded into the six rating bands, with a dashed line and dot marking where you fall.

The curve is fitted from two published reference points — the median score (the 50th-percentile band edge) and the 90th-percentile edge — which set its center and spread:

center = median score (≈ 18 lines for men, 15 for women)  ·  spread set by the 90th-percentile edge

Because higher is better, lower scores sit on the left and higher scores on the right, so the bands run Needs Improvement → Excellent across the curve. The red Needs Improvement region looks large and the gold Excellent region small on purpose: that honestly reflects that the lowest band covers the bottom slice of people while Excellent is only the top few percent.

Percentile Estimate

The percentile estimates the share of active adults of your sex you outperform. Because the reference data provides band boundaries rather than a full distribution, the percentile is approximated by mapping each band edge to its published percentile and interpolating between them:

Below Average edge ≈ 10th  ·  Average edge ≈ 30th  ·  Above Average edge ≈ 50th  ·  Good edge ≈ 70th  ·  Excellent edge ≈ 90th percentile

Your score is placed along this scale to produce an approximate percentile. It is a reasonable guide, not a precise population statistic.

How Sex Changes Your Score

Choosing male or female swaps in an entirely separate set of normative values. The line-count bands differ between the two — men's thresholds sit a few lines higher than women's at every band — so the same raw score is judged against different benchmarks depending on which table applies. Sex is the only input that changes the standards you are measured against.

Why Lateral Agility Matters

The Edgren Side Step Test was introduced in 1932 by Harry Edgren to assess lateral mobility in basketball players, and side-to-side quickness remains central to basketball, tennis, soccer, hockey, and most court and field sports, as well as many tactical occupations. Defensive sliding, closing out, and changing direction laterally all draw on the same qualities the test samples: stepping rate, rhythm, coordination, and balance while moving sideways.

Important context: the Edgren test is a pre-planned drill — you know the pattern in advance — so it measures the physical side of lateral agility rather than reactive agility, the ability to read and respond to an unpredictable stimulus. A strong score reflects quick, coordinated footwork, but it is one piece of the broader agility picture, not the whole of it.

Data Sources and Methodology

The norms and methods in this calculator are built from established testing references:

  • Edgren, H.D. (1932). An Experiment in the Testing of Ability and Progress in Basketball. Research Quarterly, 3(1), 159–171 — the original description of the side-step test.
  • Johnson, B.L., & Nelson, J.K. (1986). Practical Measurements for Evaluation in Physical Education (4th ed.). Burgess — testing protocol and normative reference data.
  • Harman, E., Garhammer, J., & Pandorf, C. (2000). Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation of Selected Tests. In Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (2nd ed.), NSCA, Human Kinetics — standardized protocol and interpretation.
  • Raya, M.A., et al. (2013). Comparison of Three Agility Tests with Male Servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 50(7), 951–960 — reliability work and broader context.
  • Topend Sports. Edgren Side Step Test — the widely cited six-band normative table used to set the rating boundaries.

A note on the distribution and percentile: the rating bands are taken directly from the published norms. The bell curve and percentile are modeled by fitting a normal distribution to those published band percentiles — clearly an approximation, and labeled as such, layered on top of directly published boundaries.

Limitations and Important Caveats

This calculator provides an estimate, not a clinical measurement. Several factors affect how precisely it reflects your true lateral agility:

  • Inconsistent protocols in the literature.Published versions vary in line spacing (8 vs 12 ft) and duration (6 vs 10 vs 15 s), and the original test was never given firm reliability or validity statistics. The Edgren test has historically been administered in several slightly different ways, and the original lacked formal reliability and validity metrics. Match the standard 12-foot, 10-second protocol for your result to align with these norms.
  • Single adult cohort. The norms reflect physically active adults roughly 18–39 and are not broken out by age. Youth and masters athletes fall outside the validated range, so their results should be read with extra caution.
  • Approximate percentile. The percentile is mapped from band boundaries rather than a complete population distribution, so it should be read as a guide, not an exact statistic.
  • The distribution curve is modeled. The bell curve is a normal approximation fitted to the band percentiles; real side-step scores are not perfectly normal, so it is illustrative rather than an exact population.
  • Setup and surface variability.Line spacing, floor grip, footwear, and how strictly faults are judged all change the count. Standardize them to make retests meaningful. Non-standard setups bias the score. Keep the markings, surface, and footwear consistent across tests.
  • A different "Modified Edgren" exists. A modified version uses a 15-second duration over a 4-meter course marked in 1-meter intervals and produces different scores — do not compare results across the two protocols.
  • Single-test snapshot. Fatigue, warm-up, footwear grip, and recent training all affect a single trial. For tracking progress, retest under the same conditions every few weeks and take the best of two or three trials.
  • Planned agility only. The test does not capture reactive agility — your ability to respond to an unpredictable cue.

Disclaimer:
This calculator provides an estimate based on established normative data and a modeled distribution. Real agility depends on training history, movement mechanics, body proportions, recovery, and individual variation. The Edgren Side Step Test involves repeated explosive lateral movement and rapid changes of direction that place stress on the ankles, knees, hips, and groin. Always warm up thoroughly beforehand and stop immediately if you experience pain, dizziness, or unusual discomfort. This tool is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered medical, fitness, or training advice. Consult a healthcare provider before beginning a new exercise or testing program, especially if you have a pre-existing condition, are over the age of 45, or have been sedentary for an extended period.